I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
—
(2016/C 260/38)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Shields & Sons Partnership
Defendant: The Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs
1.With regard to the common flat-rate scheme for farmers which is established by Chapter 2 of Title XII of Council Directive (EC) 2006/112/EC, is Article 296(2) to be interpreted as providing an exhaustive regime as to when a Member State is able to exclude a farmer from the common agricultural flat-rate scheme? In particular:
1.1.Is a Member State only able to exclude farmers from the common flat-rate scheme for farmers pursuant to Article 296(2)?
1.2.Is a Member State also able to exclude a farmer from the common flat-rate scheme for farmers using Article 299?
1.3.Does the principle of fiscal neutrality give a Member State a right to exclude a farmer from the common flat-rate scheme for farmers?
1.4.Do Member States have an entitlement to exclude farmers from the common flat-rate scheme for farmers on any other grounds?
2.How is the term ‘categories of farmers’ in Article 296(2) of Council Directive (EC) 2006/112/EC to be interpreted? In particular:
2.1.Must a relevant category of farmers be capable of being identified by reference to objective characteristics?
2.2.Can a relevant category of farmers be capable of being identified by reference to economic considerations?
2.3.What level of precision is required in identifying a category of farmers which a Member State has purported to exclude?
2.4.Does it entitle a Member State to treat as a relevant category ‘farmers who are found to be recovering substantially more as members of the flat-rate scheme than they would if they were registered for VAT’?
—
Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax OJ L 347, p. 1
—
* * *