- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-421/17 RENV: Judgment of the General Court of 28 September 2022 — Leino-Sandberg v Parliament (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Document relating to a decision refusing a third party full access to trilogue tables relating to the proposal for a regulation of the Parliament and of the Council on Europol and repealing Decisions 2009/371/JHA and 2005/681/JHA — Refusal to grant access — Second indent of Article 4(2) of Regulation No 1049/2001 — Exception for the protection of court proceedings and legal advice)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TA0421
62017TA0421
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 463/22
(Case T-421/17 RENV) (1)
(Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Document relating to a decision refusing a third party full access to trilogue tables relating to the proposal for a regulation of the Parliament and of the Council on Europol and repealing Decisions 2009/371/JHA and 2005/681/JHA - Refusal to grant access - Second indent of Article 4(2) of Regulation No 1049/2001 - Exception for the protection of court proceedings and legal advice)
(2022/C 463/29)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Päivi Leino-Sandberg (Helsinki, Finland) (represented by: O. Brouwer, B. Verheijen and S. Schubert, lawyers)
Defendant): European Parliament (represented by: N. Görlitz and J.C. Puffer, acting as Agents)
Interveners in support of the applicant: Republic of Finland (represented by: M. Pere, acting as Agent), Kingdom of Sweden (represented by: C. Meyer-Seitz, H. Shev, H. Eklinder, A. Runeskjöld, M. Salborn Hodgson and R. Shahsavan Eriksson, acting as Agents)
Re:
By her action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of Decision A(2016) 15112 of the European Parliament of 3 April 2017 refusing to grant her access to Decision A(2015) 4931 of the Parliament of 8 July 2015 addressed to Mr Emilio De Capitani.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Annuls Decision A(2016) 15112 of the European Parliament of 3 April 2017 refusing to grant Ms Päivi Leino-Sandberg access to Decision A(2015) 4931 of the Parliament of 8 July 2015 addressed to Mr Emilio De Capitani;
2.Orders the Parliament to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Ms Päivi Leino-Sandberg;
3.Orders the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden to bear their own respective costs.
(1)
OJ C 293, 4.9.2017.