- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-610/22: Order of the General Court of 23 August 2023 — Nienaber v EUIPO (BoneKare) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark BoneKare — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TB0610
62022TB0610
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
Series C
C/2023/338
30.10.2023
(Case T-610/22) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(EU trade mark - Application for EU word mark BoneKare - Absolute grounds for refusal - Descriptive character - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
(C/2023/338)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicants: Jannah Nienaber (Cloppenburg, Germany), Andreas Nienaber (Cloppenburg) (represented by: J. Eberhardt, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Klee, acting as Agent)
Re:
By their action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek the annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 4 August 2022 (Case R 348/2022-1).
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed.
2.Ms Jannah Nienaber and Mr Andreas Nienaber shall bear their own costs.
3.The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall bear its own costs.
Language of the case: German.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/338/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
* * *