EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-147/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from Upper Tribunal (United Kingdom) made on 25 March 2011 — Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Lucja Czop

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011CN0147

62011CN0147

March 25, 2011
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

21.5.2011

Official Journal of the European Union

C 152/17

(Case C-147/11)

2011/C 152/31

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Secretary of State for Work and Pensions

Defendant: Lucja Czop

Questions referred

In circumstances where a claimant:

(a)is a citizen of Poland;

(b)came to the United Kingdom before her country acceded to the EU;

(c)established herself in self-employment within the meaning of Article 49 TFEU (ex Article 43 TEC);

(d)remained here, and continued in self-employment, following accession;

(e)is no longer in self-employment; and

(f)is the primary carer of a child who came to the United Kingdom and entered general education after accession and after she ceased to be established in self-employment,

does the claimant have a right to reside in the United Kingdom on the basis that (individually or cumulatively):

(a)Regulation 1612/68 applies, together with the reasoning of the European Court of Justice in Baumbast and R v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Case C-413/99) [2002] ECR I-7091, London Borough of Harrow v Ibrahim (Case C-310/08) and Teixeira v London Borough of Lambeth (Case C-480/08);

(b)there is a general principle of EU law that equates the position of workers and the self-employed;

(c)it would impede or deter the freedom of establishment if the claimant did not have a right to reside?

Language of the case: English

OJ L 257, p. 2

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia