- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-1113/23: Action brought on 24 November 2023 — Melnichenko v Council
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TN1113
62023TN1113
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
Series C
C/2024/766
22.1.2024
(Case T-1113/23)
(C/2024/766)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Aleksandra Melnichenko (St. Moritz, Switzerland) (represented by: A. Miron, D. Müller, H. Bajer Pellet and R. Piéri, lawyers)
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul, pursuant to Article 263 TFEU, Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/1765 of 13 September 2023 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine, (1) and Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/1767 of 13 September 2023 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine, (2) insofar as those acts concern and affect the applicant;
—order the Council to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on five pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging the illegality of Article 2(1)(g), of Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP (3) and Article 3(1)(g), of Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 (4) as amended by the contested acts (‘criterion (g)’).
2.Second plea in law, alleging in the alternative an error of assessment in the application of criterion (g).
3.Third plea in law, alleging the illegality of the criterion of association in Article 2(1) of Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP and Article 3(1) of Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 in fine (‘‘association criterion’).
4.Fourth plea in law, alleging in the alternative an error of assessment in the application of the ‘association criterion’.
5.Fifth plea in law, alleging the violation of the applicant’s fundamental rights and generally of EU’s obligations for the protection of fundamental rights.
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/1765 of 13 September 2023 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (OJ 2023 L 226, p. 3).
Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/1767 of 13 September 2023 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (OJ 2023 L 226, p. 104).
Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP of 17 March 2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (OJ 2014 L 78, p. 16).
Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 of 17 March 2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (OJ 2014 L 78, p. 6).
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/766/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
* * *
Language of the case: English.