- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-155/17: Action brought on 9 March 2017 — Van Haren Schoenen v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TN0155
62017TN0155
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
24.4.2017
Official Journal of the European Union
C 129/37
(Case T-155/17)
(2017/C 129/56)
Language of the case: Dutch
Parties
Applicant: Van Haren Schoenen BV (Waalwijk, Netherlands) (represented by: A. Willems, S. De Knop and M. Meulenbelt, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the General Court should:
—declare the present application admissible;
—annul Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2257 of 14 December 2016 re-imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in the People’s Republic of China and produced by Chengdu Sunshine Shoes Co. Ltd, Foshan Nanhai Shyang Yuu Footwear Ltd and Fujian Sunshine Footwear Co. Ltd and implementing the judgment of the Court of Justice in Joined Cases C-659/13 and C-34/14; and
—order the Commission to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of its action, the applicant relies on five pleas in law. The pleas put forward are identical to those put forward in Case T-154/17, Deichmann v Commission.