EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-290/25, Aero VIM: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Mainz (Germany) lodged on 16 April 2025 – Sprocure LLC v Aero VIM GmbH

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62025CN0290

62025CN0290

April 16, 2025
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

C series

C/2025/3872

21.7.2025

(Case C-290/25, Aero VIM)

(C/2025/3872)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Sprocure LLC

Defendant: Aero VIM GmbH

Questions referred

Must Article 11(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>) be interpreted as also covering situations where the person concerned acts as a ‘straw man’ for one of the persons, entities or bodies referred to in points (a) or (b) of that paragraph, that is to say, on their behalf, but without disclosing this?

Must Article 11(1)(c) of Regulation EU No 833/2014 be interpreted as also covering the reimbursement of down payments or advance payments that have already been made on the purchase price, in the event of a refusal to deliver the goods (invoking the sanctions laid down in the Regulation)?

If so: what consequence in law does this prohibition on payment have? Can the supplier, as the other party to the contract, simply retain the down payment or advance payment?

If Questions 1 and 2 are answered in the affirmative:

Must Article 11(1) of Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 be interpreted as meaning that, in the case of contracts for the purchase of several items, where only the delivery of particular items would be in breach of the measures imposed by the Regulation, the prohibition on reimbursement laid down therein covers only claims to reimbursement in respect of the purchase price for those particular items or reimbursement claims in respect of the purchase price for all the items purchased?

Council Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 of 31 July 2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2014 L 229, p. 1).

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3872/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia