EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-272/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Diikitiko Efetio Thessalonikis (Greece) lodged on 31 May 2010 — Suzanna Verkizi-Nikolakaki v Anotato Simvoulio Epilogis Prosopikou (ASEP) and Aristotelian University of Thessaloniki

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62010CN0272

62010CN0272

May 31, 2010
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

14.8.2010

Official Journal of the European Union

C 221/25

(Case C-272/10)

()

2010/C 221/40

Language of the case: Greek

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Suzanna Verkizi-Nikolakaki

Defendant: Anotato Simvoulio Epilogis Prosopikou (ASEP) and Aristotelian University of Thessaloniki

Questions referred

1.Is Article 11(2) of Presidential Decree 164/2004, which provides that, in order to establish that the preconditions for conversion of fixed-term contracts to contracts of indefinite duration are met, the employee must submit an application to the relevant body, containing information establishing satisfaction of the said preconditions, within two months of the entry into force thereof, in keeping with the purpose of Article 139(2) EC and the effectiveness, in accordance with the third paragraph of Article 249 EC, of Council Directive 1999/70/EC of 28 June 1999 concerning the framework agreement on fixed-term work, in view of the fact that the cut-off deadline causes employees to lose their right to convert their contracts if an application is not submitted by the two-month deadline?

2.In view of the purpose of Council Directive 1999/70/EC of 28 June 1999 pursuant to Article 139(2) EC, does it suffice that the two-month deadline set for dealing with the number of employees subject to the provisions of Article 11 of Presidential Decree 164/2004, in order to put the objectives of the said directive into practical effect, in accordance with the third paragraph of Article 249 EC, was publicised simply by publication of the provisions of Article 11 of Presidential Decree 164/2004 in the Government Gazette?

3.Does the failure to extend the two-month deadline, compared with extensions to similar deadlines set in similar legislative measures which predate Presidential Decree 164/2004, reduce the general level of protection of employees, in breach of clause 8.3 of [the annex to] Council Directive 1999/70/EC of 28 June 1999?

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia