I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
C series
—
29.7.2024
(C/2024/4602)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: François Ducrotté (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Rodrigues and A. Champetier, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the Commission’s decision of 6 March 2023 not to include the applicant’s name on the reserve list of successful candidates of the open competition EPSO/AD/382/20 (AD5/AD7) in the field of External Relations;
—annul, in as far as necessary, the Commission’s decision of 11 August 2023 rejecting the request for review filed by the applicant and the implicit decision of the Commission dated 6 March 2024 rejecting the complaint lodged by the applicant under Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations;
—order the Commission to compensate the material damage suffered by the applicant resulting from the loss of the opportunity to be put in the reserve list and to be recruited (to be determined under the supervision of the Court), as well as the moral damage suffered, estimated at 5 000 euros; and,
—order the Commission to pay all the costs incurred by the applicant for the present appeal.
In support of the action, the applicant relies on six pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging a non-compliance, by the selection board, with the notice of competition.
2.Second plea in law, alleging a manifest error of assessment by the panel which interviewed the applicant.
3.Third plea in law, alleging a breach of the principle of equal treatment.
4.Fourth plea in law, alleging the instability of the composition of the selection board and lack of coordination in carrying out its proceedings.
5.Fifth plea in law, alleging a breach of the duty to give reasons with regard to the implicit decision of the Commission dated 6 March 2024 rejecting the complaint lodged by the applicant under Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations.
6.Sixth plea in law, alleging a breach of the principle of good administration and of the duty of care.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4602/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
—