- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-285/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France) lodged on 11 June 2014 — Directeur général des douanes et droits indirects, Directeur régional des douanes et droits indirects d’Auvergne v Brasserie Bouquet SA
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014CN0285
62014CN0285
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 261/16
(Case C-285/14)
2014/C 261/23
Language of the case: French
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellants: Directeur général des douanes et droits indirects, Directeur régional des douanes et droits indirects d’Auvergne
Respondent: Brasserie Bouquet SA
Question referred
Must Article 4(2) of Council Directive 92/83/EEC of 19 October 1992 on the harmonisation of the structures of excise duties on alcohol and alcoholic beverages be interpreted as meaning that the term ‘operate under licence’ refers exclusively to operation under a licence to exploit a patent or trade mark, or can that provision be interpreted as meaning that the term ‘operate under licence’ refers to operation in accordance with a production process belonging to a third party and authorised by that party?
Language of the case: French
* * *
(1) OJ L 316, p. 21.
* * *