27.7.2020

Official Journal of the European Union

C 247/17

(Case T-251/20)

(2020/C 247/26)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: KG (represented by: S. Rodrigues and A. Champetier, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—annul the Parliament’s decision dated 4 February 2020 rejecting her complaint of 29 November 2019:

—annul, if need be, the Parliament’s decision dated 30 August 2019 rejecting her initial request of 4 April 2019;

—order the defendant to compensate the applicant for non-material damage estimated, ex æquo et bono, at the sum of EUR 5 000;

—order the defendant to reimburse to the applicant all the legal costs incurred and the fees of the applicant’s retained legal counsel.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.

1.First plea in law, alleging the misinterpretation of Article 20(3) of Annex XIII of the Staff Regulations and the breach of the principle of continuity of service.

2.Second plea in law, alleging breach of the principles of legitimate expectations and acquired rights.

3.Third plea in law, alleging breach of the right to a good administration and of the duty of care.