I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2015/C 371/38)
Language of the case: Italian
Applicant: Intesa Sanpaolo SpA (Turin (TO), Italy) (represented by: P. Pozzi and F. Braga, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word elements ‘START UP INITIATIVE’ — Application for registration No 13 011 838
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 29 June 2015 in Case R 2777/2014-1
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—declare that there was a breach and incorrect application of Article 7(1)(b) and (2) of Regulation No 207/2009;
—declare that there was a breach of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009;
—annul the contested decision;
—order OHIM to pay the costs and fees incurred for the present proceedings.
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (2) of Regulation No 207/2009;
—Infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009.