EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-63/24, Galte : Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas (Lithuania) lodged on 26 January 2024 – K.L. v Migracijos departamentas prie Lietuvos Respublikos vidaus reikalų ministerijos

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024CN0063

62024CN0063

January 26, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2024/3053

13.5.2024

(Case C-63/24, Galte

(C/2024/3053)

Language of the case: Lithuanian

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: K.L.

Defendant: Migracijos departamentas prie Lietuvos Respublikos vidaus reikalų ministerijos

Question referred

Must Article 12(2)(b) of Directive 2011/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on standards for the qualification of third-country nationals or stateless persons as beneficiaries of international protection, for a uniform status for refugees or for persons eligible for subsidiary protection, and for the content of the protection granted, read in conjunction with Article 18 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, be interpreted as meaning that, in the assessment of whether the actions of a person who otherwise fulfils the criteria for the grant of refugee status are covered by the grounds for exclusion from refugee status set out in Article 12(2)(b) of Directive 2011/95/EU, there is an obligation to take into consideration the sentence already served by that person, the pardon or amnesty granted to that person, or any other circumstance of a similar nature?

The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.

OJ 2011 L 337, p. 9.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3053/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia