- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-614/20: Action brought on 1 October 2020 — Casino, Guichard-Perrachon v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TN0614
62020TN0614
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 433/58
(Case T-614/20)
(2020/C 433/72)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Casino, Guichard-Perrachon (Saint-Étienne, France) (represented by: O. de Juvigny, A. Sunderland, I. Simic and G. Aubron, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the General Court should:
—annul, pursuant to Article 263 TFEU, Decision C(2020) 5192 final of the European Commission of 23 July 2020;
—order the Commission to pay the entirety of the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law, alleging that the contested decision is unlawful, to the extent that it was adopted on the basis of documents obtained by the Commission during pre-inspections carried out on the basis of unlawful decisions, subject to applications for annulment in Cases T-249/17, Casino, Guichard-Perrachon v Commission, and T-538/19, Casino, Guichard-Perrachon v Commission.