I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-87/11)(1)
(Arbitration clause - Public service contracts - Surveillance and security services for the buildings of the Court of Auditors - Action for annulment - Decision to unilaterally terminate the contract with application for payment of damages and interest - Measure of a contractual nature - Lack of reclassification of the action - Inadmissibility - Decision to impose a penalty of exclusion for three months - Interest in bringing proceedings - Rights of defence - Serious breach of obligations - Principle that penalties must have a proper legal basis - Misuse of powers - Proportionality)
2013/C 147/28
Language of the case: French
Applicant: GRP Security (Bertrange, Luxembourg) (represented by: initially by G. Osch, then by C. Arendt and M. Larbi, lawyers)
Defendant: Court of Auditors of the European Union (represented by: initially by T. Kennedy, J.-M. Stenier and J. Vermer, then by T. Kennedy and J. Vermer, acting as Agents)
First, application for annulment of the decision of the Court of Auditors of 14 January 2011 to unilaterally terminate the framework service contract ‘Various security services’ (LOG/2026/10/02) and to apply for payment of damages and interest and, secondly, application for annulment of the decision of 14 January 2011 to impose a penalty of exclusion
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders GRP Security to pay the costs, including those relating to the applications for interim measures.
(1) OJ C 120, 16.4.2011.
* * *
Language of the case: French