EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case F-121/10: Action brought on 19 November 2010 — Heath v ECB

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62010FN0121

62010FN0121

November 19, 2010
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

29.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 30/67

(Case F-121/10)

()

2011/C 30/133

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Michael Heath (Southampton, United Kingdom) (represented by: L. Levi and M. Vandenbussche, lawyers)

Defendant: European Central Bank

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the applicant's pension slips for the month of January 2010 and the following months, in so far as these apply a pension increase of 0,6 % following the pensions adjustment procedure for 2010, and damages for loss suffered by the applicant.

Form of order sought

Annul the salary slip for January 2010 and the following months, in so far as these apply a pension increase of 0,6 %, in order to apply an increase of 2,1 % calculated in accordance with a lawful GSA [General Salary Adjustment];

to the extent necessary, annul the decisions rejecting the requests for reconsideration and the complaints lodged by the applicant, decisions of 11 May 2010 and 9 September 2010 respectively;

order the defendant to pay the difference between the pension increase of 0,6 % granted unlawfully to the applicant as from January 2010 and that of 2,1 % to which he should have been entitled, namely a salary increase of 1,5 % per month as from January 2010. Those amounts should have interest applied as from their respective due dates until the date of actual payment, calculated on the basis of the rate set by the European Central Bank for main refinancing operations, applicable during the relevant period, plus 2 points;

order the defendant to pay EUR 5 000, to compensate for the applicant's material damage resulting from the loss in his purchasing power;

order the defendant to pay EUR 5 000, assessed ex aequo et bono to compensate for his non-material damage;

order the ECB to pay the costs.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia