- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-328/22: Action brought on 30 May 2022 — Korres v EUIPO — Naos (EST. KORRES 1996 HYDRA-BIOME)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TN0328
62022TN0328
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 303/50
(Case T-328/22)
(2022/C 303/65)
Language in which the application was lodged: Greek
Parties
Applicant: Korres AE — Fysika Proionta (Metamorphosi, Attica, Greece) (represented by: S. Tsimikalis, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Naos SAS (Aix-en-Provence, France)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Application for registration designating the European Union in respect of the figurative mark EST. KORRES 1996 HYDRA-BIOME — Application No 18 197 304
Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 March 2022 in Case R 1410/2021-5
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the General Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Plea in law
—Incorrect interpretation and application of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.