- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-579/19: Judgment of the General Court of 14 April 2021 — The KaiKai Company Jaeger Wichmann v EUIPO (Gymnastic or sports equipment) (Community design — Multiple application for community designs representing gymnastic or sports equipment — Right of priority — Article 41 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Application under the Patent Cooperation Treaty — Article 4 of the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property — Priority period)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TA0579
62019TA0579
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 242/29
(Case T-579/19) (*)
(Community design - Multiple application for community designs representing gymnastic or sports equipment - Right of priority - Article 41 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Application under the Patent Cooperation Treaty - Article 4 of the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property - Priority period)
(2021/C 242/38)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: The KaiKai Company Jaeger Wichmann GbR (Munich, Germany) (represented by: J. Hellmann-Cordner, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 13 June 2019 (Case R 573/2019-3) concerning an application for registration of gymnastic or sports equipment as community designs claiming the right of priority of an international patent application filed under the Patent Cooperation Treaty.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Annuls the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 13 June 2019 (Case R 573/2019-3);
2.Dismisses the action as to the remainder;
3.Orders EUIPO to pay the costs.
*
(*) Language of the case: German.
ECLI:EU:C:2021:140