I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-271/16) (<a id="ntc1-C_2018005EN.01003201-E0001" href="#ntr1-C_2018005EN.01003201-E0001"> (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)</a>
((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark THOMAS MARSHALL GARMENTS OF LEGENDS - Earlier EU word and figurative marks MARSHALL and Marshall AMPLIFICATION - Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Admissibility of the request for proof of the earlier marks’ genuine use - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)))
(2018/C 005/42)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Yusuf Pempe (Créteil, France) (represented by: A. Vivès-Albertini, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Rampini, Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Marshall Amplification plc (Milton Keynes, United Kingdom)
Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 March 2016 (Case R 376/2015-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Marshall Amplification and Mr Pempe.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Yusuf Pempe to pay the costs.
(<a id="ntr1-C_2018005EN.01003201-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2018005EN.01003201-E0001">(<span class="super">1</span>)</a> <a href="./../../../../legal-content/EN/AUTO/?uri=OJ:C:2016:251:TOC">OJ C 251, 11.07.2016</a>.)