- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-370/24, Nastolo: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Lodi (Italy) lodged on 23 May 2024 – AT v CT
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024CN0370
62024CN0370
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
EN
C series
—
C/2024/4846
12.8.2024
(Case C-370/24, Nastolo)
(C/2024/4846)
Language of the case: Italian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: AT
Defendant: CT
Questions referred
1.Is Article 13 of Directive 2009/103/EC to be interpreted as meaning that, in the case of a road traffic accident involving a passenger travelling in a stolen vehicle, it is for the body responsible for providing compensation within the meaning of Article 10 of Directive 2009/103/EC to prove that the injured party knew that the vehicle had been stolen?
2.If so, does that provision, as thus interpreted, preclude legislation, such as the Italian legislation, interpreted and applied as meaning that the burden of proof is on the injured passenger?
—
The name of the present case is fictitious. It does not correspond to the real name of any of the parties to the proceedings.
Directive 2009/103/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 relating to insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles, and the enforcement of the obligation to insure against such liability (OJ 2009 L 263, p. 11).
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4846/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—