I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Community trade mark – Opposition procedure – Application for Community word mark BRIGHTON – National word and figurative marks BRIGHTON and earlier signs BRIGHTON – Relative grounds for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) and 8(2)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009
Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 44-47)
ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 30 June 2010 (Case R 408/2009-4) concerning an opposition procedure between Brighton Collectibles Inc. and Felmar.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Brighton Collectibles Inc. to bear its own costs and to pay the costs of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM);
3.Orders Felmar to bear its own costs.