I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-716/21) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark MAESELLE - Earlier EU figurative mark MARCELLE - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(2022/C 482/27)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Katarzyna Kaczorowska (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: P. Kurcman, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Chylińska and D. Gája, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Groupe Marcelle Inc. (Lachine, Quebec, Canada)
By her action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 6 September 2021 (Case R 670/2021-4).
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Ms Katarzyna Kaczorowska to pay the costs.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 2, 3.1.2022.