I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
—
(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Administrative procedure - Decision ordering an inspection - Article 20(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 - Subject matter and purpose of the inspection - Obligation to state reasons - Sufficiently serious indicia - Protection of privacy)
(C/2025/3044)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Symrise AG (Holzminden, Germany) (represented by: T. Kuhn, M. Rust, T.-M. Wienke, L. Bär and G. Forwood, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. Domecq, T. Franchoo and B. Cullen, acting as Agents)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Commission Decision C(2023) 1103 final of 10 February 2023, ordering it and all the companies directly or indirectly controlled by it to submit to an inspection in accordance with Article 20(4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 (Case AT.40826 – Rose).
The Court:
Dismisses the action;
Orders Symrise AG to pay the costs.
—
(1)
OJ C 235, 3.7.2023.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3044/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—