- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case F-105/11: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 13 June 2012 — Davids v Commission (Civil Service — Temporary agents — Temporary agent occupying a permanent post — Non-renewal of a fixed-term contract — Discretion of the administration — Article 8 of the CEOS — Article 4 of the Decision of the Director General of OLAF of 30 June 2005 on a new policy for the engagement and use of OLAF's temporary agents — Maximum duration of temporary staff contracts — Abuse of rights)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011FA0105
62011FA0105
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
28.7.2012
Official Journal of the European Union
C 227/37
(Case F-105/11)(<span class="super">1</span>)
(Civil Service - Temporary agents - Temporary agent occupying a permanent post - Non-renewal of a fixed-term contract - Discretion of the administration - Article 8 of the CEOS - Article 4 of the Decision of the Director General of OLAF of 30 June 2005 on a new policy for the engagement and use of OLAF's temporary agents - Maximum duration of temporary staff contracts - Abuse of rights)
2012/C 227/61
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Hans Davids (Doorn, Netherlands) (represented by: D. Abreu Caldas, S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and É. Marchal, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and D. Martin, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application for annulment of the decision of the Director-General of OLAF to reject the applicant’s request for the extension of the applicant’s contract as a member of the temporary staff within the meaning of Article 2(b) of the Conditions of Employment
Operative part of the judgment
The Tribunal:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders each party to bear its own costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 6, 7.1.12, p. 26.