EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-496/04: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 16 September 2008 — Nortrail Transport v Commission (Customs Union — External Community transit operation — Fishery products originating in Norway — Application for remission and repayment of import duties — Fairness clause — Regulations (EEC) No 2913/92 and No 2454/93 — Special situation — Retroactive opening of tariff quotas)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62004TA0496

62004TA0496

January 1, 2004
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

(Case T-496/04)

(Customs Union - External Community transit operation - Fishery products originating in Norway - Application for remission and repayment of import duties - Fairness clause - Regulations (EEC) No 2913/92 and No 2454/93 - Special situation - Retroactive opening of tariff quotas)

(2008/C 285/59)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Nortrail Transport GmbH (Kiel, Germany) (represented by: J. Krause, lawyer)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented initially by B. Schima and J. Hottiaux, then by B. Schima and M. Patakia, Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision REM 15/02 of 1 October 2004, finding that the repayment of import duties to the applicant, which are the subject of the application made by the Federal Republic of Germany, is not justified.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Dismisses the action;

2.Orders Nortrail Transport GmbH to bear its own expenses and to pay the expenses incurred by the Commission.

* * *

(1) OJ C 93, 16.4.2005.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia