- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-353/25, Tværkilde: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Retten i Kolding (Denmark) lodged on 27 May 2025 – Anklagemyndigheden v T
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62025CN0353
62025CN0353
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2025/4039
28.7.2025
(Case C-353/25, Tværkilde
(C/2025/4039)
Language of the case: Danish
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Anklagemyndigheden
Defendant: T
Question referred
Must Article 1(3) of Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/403 (2) of 18 March 2016 supplementing Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to the classification of serious infringements of the Union rules, which may lead to the loss of good repute by the road transport operator, and amending Annex III to Directive 2006/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, as amended by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/694 of 2 May 2022 (3) amending Regulation (EU) 2016/403 as regards new serious infringements of the Union rules which may lead to the loss of good repute by the road transport operator
be interpreted as meaning that the national authority competent to decide on the withdrawal of a road transport authorisation is obliged to apply Regulation 2016/403 in connection with its assessment of whether an undertaking with a road transport authorisation satisfies the requirement of good repute laid down in Article 3(1)(b) of Regulation No 1071/2009 in a situation where
the infringements of EU rules by the undertaking do not exceed the threshold set out in Annex II to Regulation (EU) 2022/694; and
no lower threshold is established by the Member State?
—
The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.
(2)
OJ 2016 L 74, p. 8.
(3)
OJ 2022 L 129, p. 22.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4039/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—