I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2016/C 191/52)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Intesa Sanpaolo SpA (Torino, Italy) (represented by: P. Pozzi and G. Ghisletti, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Intesia Group Holding GmbH (Böblingen, Germany)
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘INTESA’ — EU trade mark No 3 105 277
Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 January 2016 in Case R 632/2015-1
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order the other parties to pay the costs of the present proceeding, as well as those of the EUIPO application for revocation and appeal proceedings.
—Infringement of Articles 51(1)(a) and 51(2) of Regulation No 207/2009.