EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-196/09: Action brought on 25 May 2009 — TerreStar Europe v Commission

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62009TN0196

62009TN0196

January 1, 2009
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

18.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 167/19

(Case T-196/09)

2009/C 167/37

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: TerreStar Europe Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: R. Olofsson, lawyer, J. Killick, Barrister)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul the contested decision;

order the Commission to pay the costs;

take such other of further steps as justice may require.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In the present case, the applicant seeks the annulment of Commission Decision C(2009) 3746 final/2 of 13 May 2009, regarding selection of operators of pan-European systems providing mobile satellite services (MSS) adopted in application of the Decision No 626/2008/EC (1) in so far as it rejects the application of the applicant.

In support of its claims, the applicant puts forward three pleas in law.

First, it submits that the Commission committed a manifest error of assessment in finding that TerreStar did not meet the required milestones. The applicant claims that the inconsistencies between the information and a lack of evidence in completion of one of the milestone as found by the Commission were due to a misunderstanding of the information submitted and could have been cleared up on a simple request by the Commission.

Second, the applicant contends that the Commission acted in breach of the principle of good administration and the principle of proportionality by failing to request clarification and to review the clarifications voluntarily submitted by TerreStar.

Third, in the alternative, the applicant claims that the contested decision lacks adequate reasoning.

* * *

(1) Decision No 626/2008/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 June 2008 on the selection and authorisation of systems providing mobile satellite services (MSS) (OJ 2008 L 172, p. 15)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia