I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(Action for annulment - Commercial policy - Article XXVIII of the GATT - Agreement between the European Union and Brazil - Modification of concessions on tariff rate quotas as a consequence of the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the Union - Cooked poultry meat - Commission implementing regulation - Regulatory act entailing implementing measures - No individual concern - Inadmissibility)
(C/2024/7033)
Language of the case: German
Applicant: Vossko GmbH & Co. KG (Ostbevern, Germany) (represented by: L. Harings and F. Jacobs, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. Konstantinidis, R. Vidal Puig and R. Pethke, acting as Agents)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/1629 of 9 August 2023 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/761 as regards the quantities that may be imported under certain tariff rate quotas in the sectors of sugar and of poultry following the agreement between the European Union and the Federative Republic of Brazil (OJ 2023 L 202, p. 1).
1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
2.There is no need to rule on the application to intervene of the Council of the European Union.
3.Vossko GmbH & Co. KG is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those of the European Commission.
4.The Council shall bear its own costs relating to the application to intervene.
—
Language of the case: German.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7033/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
* * *
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C C/2024/415, 3.1.2024.
ECLI:EU:C:2025:140
15