- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-85/18: Order of the General Court of 17 August 2022 — Batchelor v Commission (Action for annulment — Representation by a lawyer who is not a third party independent of the applicant — Inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018TB0085
62018TB0085
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 398/23
(Case T-85/18) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Action for annulment - Representation by a lawyer who is not a third party independent of the applicant - Inadmissibility)
(2022/C 398/26)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Edward William Batchelor (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: B. Hoorelbeke, lawyer and M. Healy, Solicitor)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. Konstantinidis and C. Ehrbar, acting as Agents)
Re:
By his action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant, Mr Edward William Batchelor, seeks the annulment of European Commission Decision C(2017) 8430 final of 5 December 2017 in so far as it refused him access to the ethics declaration of a director of the institution and indicated that it did not hold any other document falling within the scope of his application for access to documents (‘the contested decision’).
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
2.Mr Edward William Batchelor is ordered to pay the costs.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 152, 30.4.2018.
Language of the case: English
ECLI:EU:C:2022:398