- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-164/23: Action brought on 27 March 2023 — Drinks Prod v EUIPO — Wolff and Illg (IGISAN)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TN0164
62023TN0164
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
22.5.2023
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 179/66
(Case T-164/23)
(2023/C 179/92)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Drinks Prod SRL (Păntășești, Romania) (represented by: I. Speciac, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Siegfried Wolff (Berlin, Germany), Matthias Illg (Berlin)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark IGISAN — Application for registration No 18 329 332
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 January 2023 in Case R 982/2022-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision rendered by the Board of Appeal in the sense of allowing the appeal filed by the applicant against the decision of the Opposition Division and, consequently, oblige EUIPO to continue the registration proceedings for the trade mark at issue for all requested goods and services in Classes 3 and 5.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.