EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-1064/23: Action brought on 9 November 2023 — ADS L. Kowalik, B. Włodarczyk v EUIPO — ESSAtech (Accessory for wireless remote control)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TN1064

62023TN1064

November 9, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

Series C

C/2024/469

(Case T-1064/23)

(C/2024/469)

Language in which the application was lodged: Polish

Parties

Applicant: ADS L. Kowalik, B. Włodarczyk s.c. (Sosnowiec, Poland) (represented by: M. Oleksyn and M. Stępkowski, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: ESSAtech (Přistoupim, Czech Republic)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the design at issue: Applicant

Design at issue: Community design Remote controls [wireless] (accessories for-) — Community design No 4 539 302-0001

Proceedings before EUIPO: Invalidity proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 September 2023 in Case R 1070/2020-3

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul or amend the contested decision by rejecting the application for a declaration of invalidity of the contested design;

order EUIPO and the participant to pay the costs incurred by them; and order EUIPO and the participant to pay the costs incurred by the applicant, including the costs incurred in the proceedings before EUIPO.

Pleas in law

Infringement of the second sentence of Article 62 of Regulation No 6/2002 in conjunction with Article 108 of Regulation No 6/2002, with the first sentence of Article 27(2) and (4) of Regulation No 2018/625, (1) and with the infringement of Article 41(2)(c) in conjunction with Article 41(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, namely, the principle of good administration and equality of arms of the parties;

Infringement of Article 8(1), in conjunction with Article 25(1)(b), of Regulation No 6/2002, and with the infringement of Article 41(2)(c) — in conjunction with Article 41(1) — of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, namely, the principle of good administration.

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 of 5 March 2018 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Union trade mark and repealing Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/1430 (OJ 2018 L 104, p. 1).

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/469/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia