I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-96/09)(*1)
(Action for annulment - Common agricultural policy - Support schemes for farmers - Production aid for tobacco - Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 - Not of individual concern - Inadmissible)
2011/C 347/52
Language of the case: French
Applicant: Union des coopératives agricoles des producteurs de tabac de France (UCAPT) (Paris, France) (represented by: B. Peignot and D.F. Garreau, lawyers)
Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Moore and P. Mahnič Bruni, Agents)
Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: K. Banks and G. von Rintelen, Agents)
Action for annulment of Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 of 19 January 2009 establishing common rules for direct support schemes for farmers under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers, amending Regulations (EC) No 1290/2005, (EC) No 247/2006, (EC) No 378/2007 and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 (OJ 2009 L 30, p. 16)
1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
2.Union des coopératives agricoles des producteurs de tabac de France shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union, including the costs of the proceedings for interim measures.
3.The European Commission shall bear its own costs.
(*1)
OJ C 90, 18.4.2009.