- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-270/16 P: Judgment of the General Court of 14 February 2017 — Kerstens v Commission (Appeal — Civil Service — Officials — Dismissal of the action at first instance — Acts contrary to the dignity of the civil service — Dissemination of insulting remarks with regard to another official — Disciplinary proceedings — Enquiry in the form of an examination of the facts — Disciplinary penalty of a reprimand — Procedural irregularity — Consequences of the irregularity)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TA0270
62016TA0270
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 95/12
(Case T-270/16 P) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
((Appeal - Civil Service - Officials - Dismissal of the action at first instance - Acts contrary to the dignity of the civil service - Dissemination of insulting remarks with regard to another official - Disciplinary proceedings - Enquiry in the form of an examination of the facts - Disciplinary penalty of a reprimand - Procedural irregularity - Consequences of the irregularity))
(2017/C 095/20)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Appellant: Petrus Kerstens (Overijse, Belgium) (represented by: C. Mourato, lawyer)
Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: T. Bohr and C. Ehrbar, Agents)
Re:
Appeal brought against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 18 March 2016, Kerstens v Commission (F-23/15, EU:F:2016:65), and seeking to have that judgment set aside.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Sets aside the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 18 March 2016, Kerstens v Commission (F-23/15, EU:F:2016:65) in so far as it rejects the claim for annulment of the European Commission’s decision of 15 April 2014 imposing a reprimand on Mr Petrus Kerstens;
2.Annuls the Commission’s decision of 15 April 2014 imposing a reprimand on Mr Kerstens;
3.Orders the Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings on appeal and of the proceedings at first instance.
(<span class="note"> <a id="ntr1-C_2017095EN.01001201-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2017095EN.01001201-E0001">*1</a> </span>) OJ C 260, 18.7.2016.