I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-772/21) (*)
(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU figurative mark efbet - Genuine use of a mark - Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Proof of genuine use - Article 95 of Regulation 2017/1001 - Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625)
(2023/C 104/46)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Brobet ltd. (Ta’Xbiex, Malta) (represented by: F. Bojinova, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: N. Lamsters and D. Hanf, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Efbet Partners OOD (Sofia, Bulgaria)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment in part of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 22 September 2021 (Case R 624/2021-2).
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Brobet ltd. to pay the costs.
(*)
Language of the case: English
ECLI:EU:C:2023:140
* * *
OJ C 73, 14.2.2022.