- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-446/05: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 13 March 2008 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de Première Instance de Bruxelles (Belgium)) — Criminal proceedings against Ioannis Doulamis (Article 81 EC, read in conjunction with Article 10 EC — National legislation prohibiting advertising of dental care services)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62005CA0446
62005CA0446
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
9.5.2008
Official Journal of the European Union
C 116/2
(Case C-446/05)(1)
(Article 81 EC, read in conjunction with Article 10 EC - National legislation prohibiting advertising of dental care services)
(2008/C 116/03)
Language of the case: French
Referring court
Party in the main criminal proceedings
Intervening parties: Union des Dentistes et Stomatologistes de Belgique (UPR), Jean Totolidis
Re:
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Tribunal de Première Instance de Bruxelles — Interpretation of Article 81 EC, the second paragraph of Article 10 EC and Article 3(1)(g) EC — National legislation prohibiting all advertising in the dental care sector
Operative part of the judgment
Article 81 EC, read in conjunction with Article 3(1)(g) EC and the second paragraph of Article 10 EC, does not preclude a national law, such as the Law of 15 April 1958, which prohibits any person or dental care providers, in the context of professional services or a dental surgery, from engaging in advertising of any kind in the dental care sector.
(1)
OJ C 48, 25.2.2006.