I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Action for annulment – Specific programme for research and technological development on energy, environment and sustainable development – Protop project – Subsidy contract – Demand for recovery of payments made on account pursuant to a contract for the financing of research – Sub-contracting – Enforcement order – Act not subject to review – Inadmissibility
APPLICATION for annulment of the enforcement order decision adopted by the Commission on 6 April 2009 by which the Commission called upon the applicant to refund all the payments made on account within the framework of a subsidy contract relating to a research project falling within the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration on ‘Energy, environment and sustainable development’.
1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
2.The Centre d’étude et de valorisation des algues SA (CEVA) is ordered to pay the costs.