I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-201/11) (<span class="super">1</span>)
((Competition - Abuse of dominant position - Slovenian mobile telephone services market - Decision rejecting a complaint - Case being dealt with by the competition authority of a Member State - No EU interest))
(2015/C 056/18)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Si.mobil telekomunikacijske storitve d.d. (Ljubljana, Slovenia) (represented by: P. Alexiadis and E. Sependa, Solicitors, and subsequently by P. Alexiadis, P. Figueroa Regueiro and A. Melihen, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Giolito, B. Gencarelli and A. Biolan, and subsequently by C. Giolito and A. Biolan, acting as Agents)
Interveners in support of the defendant: Republic of Slovenia (represented by: T. Mihelič Žitko and V. Klemenc, acting as Agents); and Telekom Slovenije d.d. formerly Mobitel, telekomunikacijske storitve d.d. (Ljubljana, Slovenia) (represented by: J. Sladič and P. Sladič, lawyers)
Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2011) 355 final of 24 January 2011 rejecting the applicant’s complaint concerning infringements of Article 102 TFEU allegedly committed by Mobitel on a number of wholesale and retail mobile telephone markets (Case COMP/39.707 — Si.mobil/Mobitel).
The Court:
1)Dismisses the action;
2)Orders Si.mobil telekomunikacijske storitve d.d. to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission and by Telekom Slovenije d.d;
3)Orders the Republic of Slovenia to bear its own costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 160, 28.5.2011.