EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-245/04: Order of the Court of First Instance of 8 January 2008 — Commission v Lior and Others (Arbitration clause — Jurisdiction of the Court of First Instance — Action against a European Economic Interest Grouping and its members and former members — Partial jurisdiction)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62004TB0245

62004TB0245

January 8, 2008
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 64/39

(Case T-245/04) (1)

(Arbitration clause - Jurisdiction of the Court of First Instance - Action against a European Economic Interest Grouping and its members and former members - Partial jurisdiction)

(2008/C 64/63)

Languages of the case: French and Greek

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: first H. Støvlbæk, Agent, and M. Bra, lawyer, then H. Støvlbæk and M. Konstantinidis, Agents, and B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Defendants: Lior GEIE (Brussels, Belgium); Lior International NV (Hoeilaart, Belgium); Deira SA (Hoeilaart); Eutec Srl (Forli, Italy); Mindshare BVBA (Sint-Martens-Latem, Belgium); Società politecnica italiana ricerche e progetti Srl (Città di Castello, Italy); RPA Spa (Perugia, Italy); Carmen eV (Straubing, Germany); (represented by: V. Marien, lawyer); University College Dublin — Energy Research Group (Dublin, Ireland) (represented by: F. Herbert and L. Demeyere, lawyers); Beneport SA (Brussels); Europe Information Service SA (Brussels); Managium SPRL (Brussels) (represented by: J.-P. Brusseleers, lawyer); and Aris Hellas EPE (Kifissia, Greece) (represented by: K. Sakellariadis, lawyer)

Re:

Action pursuant to Article 238 EC seeking an order against all the defendants jointly to repay the amounts paid by the Community in accordance with six contracts concluded in the framework of the Thermie programme and one contract concluded in the framework of the Altener II programme.

Operative part of the order

1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible in so far as it relates to Deira SA, Eutec Srl, Mindshare BVBA, Società politecnica italiana recherche e progetti Srl, RPA Spa, Carmen eV, University College Dublin — Energy Research Group, Beneport SA, Europe Information Service SA, Managium SPRL and Aris Hellas EPE.

2.The Commission shall bear its own costs with regard to the action brought against Deira, Eutec, Mindshare, Società politecnica italiana recerche e progetti, RPA, Carmen, University College Dublin — Energy Research Group, Beneport, Europe Information Service, Managium and Aris Hellas, and pay the costs of Deira, Eutec, Mindshare, Società politecnica italiana recerche e progetti, RPA, Carmen, University College Dublin — Energy Research Group, Beneport, Europe Information Service and Managium.

3.Aris Hellas shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 213, 6.9.2003 (formerly Case C-280/03).

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia