EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-412/08: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Baden-Württemberg (Germany) lodged on 22 September 2008 — Swiss Caps AG v Hauptzollamt Singen

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62008CN0412

62008CN0412

January 1, 2008
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

6.12.2008

Official Journal of the European Union

C 313/14

(Case C-412/08)

(2008/C 313/21)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Swiss Caps AG

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Singen

Questions referred

1.Is heading 1517 of the Combined Nomenclature (Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 — Combined Nomenclature (CN)) to be interpreted as meaning that the addition of 10 mg of lecithin, 18,8 mg of vitamin E, 8,2 mg of wax, 8 mg of calcium pantothenate, 0,2 mg of folic acid and 0,11 mg of biotin to a mixture consisting of 500 mg of cold-pressed black cumin oil (62,5 % or 83,3 %), 38,7 mg of soya oil and 16 mg of butterfat is to be regarded as so small that it does not affect the classification of such a preparation under that heading?

2.If the reply to the first question is in the affirmative: Is Rule 5 of the General Rules for the interpretation of the Combined Nomenclature to be interpreted as meaning that capsule casings containing the substances specified above are to be regarded as packing material?

3.If the reply to the second question is in the negative: Is heading 1517 of the Combined Nomenclature to be interpreted as meaning that a capsule casing consisting of 313,97 mg of gelatin mass (47,3 % gelatin, 17,2 % glycerine, 35,5 % water), 4,30 mg of paste consisting of 50 % titanium dioxide and 50 % glycerine, and 1,73 mg of paste consisting of 25 % quinoline yellow lacquer and 75 % glycerine leads to the exclusion of the capsules described above from that heading?

(1) OJ 1987 L 256, p. 1.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia