I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-602/21) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2002/49/EC - Assessment and management of environmental noise - Noise prevention - Major roads and major railways - Article 8(1) and (2) - Non-compliant or nonexistent action plans - Article 10(2) - Annex VI - Nonexistent summaries of action plans)
(2023/C 205/08)
Language of the case: Polish
Applicant: European Commission (represented by: D. Milanowska, M. Noll-Ehlers and M. Rynkowski, acting as Agents)
Defendant: Republic of Poland (represented by: B. Majczyna, acting as Agent)
The Court:
1.Declares that the Republic of Poland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 8(1) and (2), Annex V, point 1, ninth indent, and Article 10(2) of Directive 2002/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 June 2002 relating to the assessment and management of environmental noise, read in conjunction with Annex VI of that directive:
—by failing to adopt, within the time limits laid down by that directive, action plans for the areas in which the limit values were not exceeded;
—by failing to make provision for the action plans to include actions intended to be taken in the next five years to preserve quiet areas;
—by failing to draw up action plans concerning the 13 major railways and 247 major roads referred to in Annex A to the present judgment; and
—by failing to submit summaries of the action plans concerning those major railways and major roads as well as the 16 major roads referred to in Annex B to the present judgment.
2.Orders the Republic of Poland to pay the costs.
* Language of the case: Polish.
(1) OJ C 490, 6.12.2021.