I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2016/C 326/12)
Language of the case: German
Applicants: Susanne Sokoll-Seebacher, Manfred Naderhirn
Intervening parties: Agnes Hemetsberger, Mag. Jungwirth und Mag. Fabian OHG and Others
By the order of 30 June 2016, the Court (Eighth Chamber) orders:
The judgment of 13 February 2014 in Sokoll-Seebacher (C-367/12, EU:C:2014:68) must be read as meaning that the criterion relating to a strict limit on the number of ‘persons who continue to be served’, laid down by the national legislation at issue in the main proceedings, is not to be applied, for the purposes of determining the existence of a need to open a new pharmacy, in a general manner, in every specific situation which will be the subject of an assessment.