I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(Case T-860/16)
(2017/C 038/61)
Language of the case: German
Applicant: Wirecard AG (Aschheim, Germany) (represented by: A. Bayer, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark containing the word element ‘mycard2go’– Application for registration No 14 303 465
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 October 2016 in Case R 281/2016-4
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision and refer the case to the defendant to take further steps in the registration proceedings for EU trade mark 014303465;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs, including those incurred during the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO.
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009 and of Article 7(2) of Regulation No 207/2009.