- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-219/16: Action brought on 9 March 2016 — Aldi v EUIPO (VISAGE)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TN0219
62016TN0219
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
27.6.2016
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 232/32
(Case T-219/16)
(2016/C 232/42)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Aldi GmbH & Co. KG (Mülheim an der Ruhr, Germany) (represented by: N. Lützenrath, U. Rademacher, C. Fürsen and N. Bertram, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word element ‘VISAGE’ — Application for registration No 13 502 364
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 February 2016 in Case R 507/2015-5
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009.