EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case F-48/08: Action brought on 27 April 2008 — Ortega Serrano v Commission

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62008FN0048

62008FN0048

January 1, 2008
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

5.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/52

(Case F-48/08)

(2008/C 171/105)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Antonio Ortega Serrano (Cádiz, Spain) (represented by: A. Ortega Serrano, lawyer)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision of the selection board in competition EPSO/AD/26/05 not to include the applicant's name on the list of successful candidates.

Form of order sought

Annul the decision not to include the applicant's name in the reserve list of competition EPSO/AD/26/05 or to afford him the opportunity of taking the oral test again;

Order the Commission to set a new date for the oral test;

Order the Commission to state the reasons for its decision EPSO/900/R;

Grant the applicant access to the records of the oral test;

Grant the applicant access to all the documents which form part of his personal file;

Declare that the applicant, who is a lawyer practising before the Spanish courts, may represent himself;

Order the examination of the personal files of all the candidates whose names are included in the list of successful candidates in order to verify that all of them have a level of education which corresponds to completed university studies of at least three years attested by a diploma in law and that they submitted their applications within the time limits and in the correct form;

Declare the documents presented as annexes in French and English to be admissible;

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia