I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
2014/C 261/48
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Bankia, SA (Valencia, Spain) (represented by: F. De Barba, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Banco ActivoBank (Portugal), SA (Lisboa, Portugal)
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—Annul the decision of the Second Chamber of the Board of Appeal of 14 February 2014 in cases R 649/2013-2 and R 744/2013-2, so that the Community trade mark application n° 10125284 ‘BANKIA’ be granted for all the goods and services;
—Condemn the opponent and/or the OHIM to pay the costs incurred by the applicant/appellant in connection with this appeal.
Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant
Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark containing the word element ‘Bankia’ for goods and services in Classes 9, 16, 35, 36, 38, 41 and 45 — Community trade mark application n° 10125284
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Banco ActivoBank (Portugal), SA
Mark or sign cited in opposition: The national word mark ‘BANKY’ for services in Class 36
Decision of the Opposition Division: The opposition was partially upheld
Decision of the Board of Appeal: The appeal of BANKIA S.A. was dismissed and the appeal of Banco ActivoBank (Portugal), SA partially upheld, rejecting the contested trade mark for a wider range of services
Pleas in law: Infringement of Art. 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009