EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-586/19: Action brought on 26 August 2019 — PL v Commission

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TN0586

62019TN0586

August 26, 2019
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

28.10.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 363/23

(Case T-586/19)

(2019/C 363/31)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: PL (represented by: J.-N. Louis, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul the Commission’s decision of 12 December 2018 establishing the applicant’s 2017 CDR;

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action against the Commission’s decision establishing the applicant’s career development report in respect of 2017 (2017 CDR), the latter relies on three pleas in law.

1.First plea in law, alleging infringement of Articles 22a and 22b of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union (the Staff Regulations) and infringement by the DG of DG HR of his duty to have regard for the welfare of officials.

2.Second plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union which confers on the applicant the right to good administration and, in particular, the right to have his affairs handled impartially, fairly and within a reasonable time.

3.Third plea in law, alleging infringement of the general implementing provisions for Article 43 of the Staff Regulations, breach of the duty to state reasons and failure to observe the rights of the defence.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia