- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-79/20: Action brought on 12 February 2020 — AI v ECDC
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TN0079
62020TN0079
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 129/6
(Case T-79/20)
(2020/C 129/06)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: AI (represented by: L. Levi and A. Champetier, lawyers)
Defendant: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC)
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the decision dated 5 April 2019 rejecting his request for assistance of 10 April 2018;
—annul, if need be, the decision dated 4 November 2019 rejecting his complaint dated 5 July 2019;
—order financial compensation which can be evaluated, ex aequo et bono, as the sum of EUR 75 000;
—order the reimbursement of his legal costs incurred.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging violation of the duty to state reasons and the right to be heard.
2.Second plea in law, alleging manifest error of assessment and a breach of Article 24 of the Staff Regulations.
3.Third plea in law, alleging violation of the duty of care.