- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-24/23: Action brought on 25 January 2023 — UF v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TN0024
62023TN0024
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
13.3.2023
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 94/58
(Case T-24/23)
(2023/C 94/70)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: UF (represented by: S. Orlandi, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the decision of 6 April 2022 dismissing the applicant;
—order the European Commission to pay the applicant a sum set ex aequo et bono for the non-material damage caused and to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging infringement of the obligation to state reasons, the applicant’s rights of defence, the duty to have regard to the welfare of officials and the principle of proportionality.
2.Second plea in law, alleging a manifest error of assessment.
3.Third plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 2(c) of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union.
4.Fourth plea in law, alleging misuse of powers.