I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(2015/C 337/18)
Language of the case: Finnish
Applicant: Työhönvalmennus Valma Oy (Lahti, Finland) (represented by: S. Salonen and K. Parviainen, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Trade mark at issue: (Representation of a tridimensional mark (Shape of box) — Application for registration No 12137337
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 4 May 2015 in Case R 1690/2014-2
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision in so far as it upholds the conclusion of the examiner that the mark applied for is devoid of distinctive character with respect to the goods concerned;
—grant registration of the mark or alternatively refer the trade mark application back to OHIM for further consideration;
—order OHIM to pay the costs.
—Infringement of Article 7(1) of Regulation No 207/2009/Regulation No 2868/95;
—Infringement of Article 7(3) applied in conjunction with Article 7(1)(b).